Combining Ability Estimates for Egg Production Traits from Line X Tester Analysis

Authors

  • Dr. R.Sh

line x tester analysis, combining ability estimates, local strains of chicken

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to study the combining ability for egg production traits using the line x tester mating design. Four local male lines (Baheij, Bj; Matrouh, Mt; Silver Montazah, SM and Golden Montazah, GM) and two commercial female testers (Lohman Brown, LB and Lohman Selected Leghorn, LSL) were used in this study. Combining ability estimates are important genetic attributes to chicken breeders in predicting improvement via hybridization and selection programs. The magnitude of specific combining ability (SCA) variance was evident from mean squares, indicating that egg production traits had been controlled by non-additive genes. However, among the four male lines, Silver Montazah (SM) showed maximum general combining ability (GCA) effects for number of eggs at 90 d., of laying (EN1), number of eggs at 180 d., of laying (EN2), number of eggs at 240 d., of laying (EN3), number of eggs till 52 wks., of laying (EN4), average egg weight at 52 wks., of laying (EW4) and egg mass throughout 52 wks., of laying (EM) studied traits. The second high GCA scoring parent for EN1, EN2, EN3, EN4, EW4 and EM was GM parental line.

Downloads

How to Cite

Combining Ability Estimates for Egg Production Traits from Line X Tester Analysis. (2012). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 12(G5), 19-28. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/699

References

Abou El-Ghar, R Sh, F Abdou (2004) Evaluation of genetic variance components based on the concept of generation means for some economic traits in chickens. 24, 687-699.

Abou El-Ghar, R Sh, H Ghanem, O Aly (2010) ESTIMATION OF GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR SOME EGG PRODUCTION TRAITS IN THREE GENERATIONS OF CROSSING SOME LOCAL STRAINS WITH TWO COMMERCIAL LINES OF LAYING HENS. 34(4), 939-957.

Abou El-Ghar, R Sh, H Shalan, H Ghanem, O Aly (2009) Egg quality characteristics from some developed strains of chickens and their crosses. 29, 1173-1186.

Abou El-Ghar, R Sh, F Abdou, G Gebriel, A Enab, T Mahmoud (2003) Combining ability and genetic gain of some economic traits in Norfa chickens. 23, 687-704.

L Amrit (1980) Studies on the performance of 3x3 diallel crosses involving broiler breeds of chickens. 48, 4226.

R Fairfull, R Gowe (1990) Poultry Breeding and Genetics. 705.

R Fairfull, R Gowe, A Emsley (1983) Diallel cross of six long-term selected Leghorn strains with emphasis on heterosis and reciprocal effects. 24, 133-158.

M Farghaly, K Saleh (1988) The effect of crossbreeding on egg traits in laying hens. 8, 376-392.

R Gupta, A Khan, Shrikant Joshi (2000) Combining ability analysis for egg production and egg weight in weight in progenies of a 3x3 diallel cross of white Leghorn. 77, 223-226.

J Hill, A Nordskog (1958) Heterosis in Poultry. 37(5), 1159-1169.

H Huang, Y Lee (1991) The general and specific combining abilities of Country chickens: A study of 4x4 diallel crosses. 20, 27-42.

M Iraqi (2008) Estimation of cross breeding effects for egg production traits in crossbreeding experiment involving two local strains of chickens. 28, 876-882.

M Iraqi, M Khalil, M El-Attrouny (2012) Estimation of crossbr ee ding parameters for egg production traits in crossing Golden Montazah with White Leghorn chicken. 24(4).

O Kempthorne (1957) An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. 191-200.

M Kosba, H El-Halim (2008) Evaluation of the Egyption local strains of chickens. 28, 1239-1251.

E Lopez-Perez (1979) Comparisons among five different testers for the evaluation of unselected lines of maize (Zea mays L.).

R Oldemeyer, W Davis, H Bush, A Erichsen (1968) The evaluation of and the use of the Top-Cross test as a method of selecting inbred lines of sugarbeets for general combining ability. 15(1).

(2000) SAS/STAT User's Guide.

M Shebl, M Ali; Magda, M Balat, T Tag El-Din (1990) Evaluation of combining ability for some body size traits and feathering in a diallel cross of chickens. 10, 159-177.

M Shebl (1991) Inheritance of age at sexual maturity and its relationship with egg production traits in Alexandria strain chickens. 11, 413-427.

Sanjay Singh, Rishi Singh, Snehanshu Singh, Amit Sharma (1983) Estimation of genetic parameters and heterosis in cytoplasmic male sterility based experimental hybrids for yield and component traits. 11(2), 384-389.

M Szydlowski, T Szwaczkowski (2001) Bayesian segregation analysis of production traits in two strains of laying chickens. 80, 125-131.

S Verma, P Pani, S Mohapatra (1987) Evaluation of additive and non-additive gene effects for some economic traits in White Leghorn chickens. 57, 300-305.

M Wei, J Van Der Werf (1993) Animal model estimation of additive and dominance variances in egg production traits of poultry. 71, 57-65.

M Wei, H Van Der Steen, ; Van Der Werf, E Brascamp (1991) Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters. I. Variances and Covariances under the one-locus model. 108, 253.

M Wei, J Van Der Werf, E Brascamp (1991) Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters 11. Genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance under the model with two loci. 108, 262.

S Wearden, D Tindell, J Craig (1965) Use of a Full Diallel Cross to Estimate General and Specific Combining Ability in Chickens ,. 44(4), 1043-1053.

Combining Ability Estimates for Egg Production Traits from Line X Tester Analysis

Published

2012-10-02

How to Cite

Combining Ability Estimates for Egg Production Traits from Line X Tester Analysis. (2012). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 12(G5), 19-28. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/699