Comparative Evaluation of the Dynamics of Alcohol Production of Wine Yeast Strains Isolated in Tokaj Region

Authors

  • Zoltán Kállai

  • Zsuzsa Antunovics

  • Gyula Oros

yeast, wine, fermentation dynamics, saccharomyces, starmerella, tokaj

Abstract

The dynamics of ethanol production of wine yeasts were examined in model experiments as well as in the winery. The ethanol concentration in young wines fermented by local strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. uvarum or Starmerella bacillaris (21, 2 and 2, respectively) did not vary considerably (c.v. 1.9 %). All of them produced significantly higher amount of ethanol than the type strain [ATCC 26108] of S. cerevisiae. However, their performance during the fermentation process diverged significantly. Thus the lag phase varied between 33 and 123 hours, while the time requested to produce half of the final ethanol concentration varied between 67 and 294 hours.

Downloads

How to Cite

Comparative Evaluation of the Dynamics of Alcohol Production of Wine Yeast Strains Isolated in Tokaj Region. (2020). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 20(D6), 1-22. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/2744

References

N Jolly, C Varela, I Pretorius (2013) Not your ordinary yeast: Non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered. 14(2), 215-237.

R Davenport (1974) Microecology of yeast and yeast-lke organisms associated with an English vineyard. 13, 123-130.

R Mortimer, M Polsinelli (1999) On the origins of wine yeast. 150, 199-204.

Gillian Heard, Graham Fleet (1985) Growth of Natural Yeast Flora during the Fermentation of Inoculated Wines. 50(3), 727-728.

M Ganga, C Martínez (2008) Effect of wine yeast monoculture practice on the biodiversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts. 96.

M Ciani, F Maccarelli (1998) Oenological properties of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with wine-making. 14(2), 199-203.

C Egli, W Edinger, C Mitrakul, T Henick-Kling (1998) Dynamics of indigenous and inoculated yeast population and their effect on the sensory character of Riesling and Chardonnay wines. 85, 779-789.

A Soden, I Francis, H Oakey, P Henschke (2008) Effects of co-fermentation with Candida stellata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the aroma and composition of Chardonnay wine. 6(1), 21-30.

Katharina Zott, Cécile Thibon, Marina Bely, Aline Lonvaud-Funel, Denis Dubourdieu, Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede (2011) The grape must non-Saccharomyces microbial community: Impact on volatile thiol release. 151(2), 210-215.

E Guerra, G Sordi, I Mannazzu, F Clementi, F Fatichenti (1999) Occurrence of wine yeasts on grapes subjected to different pesticide treatments. 11, 221-230.

Paolo Cabras, Alberto Angioni (2000) Pesticide Residues in Grapes, Wine, and Their Processing Products. 48(4), 967-973.

J Mauricio, S Guijo, J Ortega (1991) Relationship Between Phospholipid and Sterol Contents inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeandTorulaspora delbrueckiiand their Fermentation Activity in Grape Musts. 42(4), 301-308.

E Hansen, P Nissen, P Sommer, J Nielsen, N Arneborg (2001) The effect of oxygen on the survival of non-Saccharomyces yeasts during mixed culture fermentations of grape juice with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 91(3), 541-547.

G Fleet (2003) Yeast interactions and wine flavour. 86(1-2), 11-22.

Jessica Lleixà, Valentina Martín, María Portillo, Francisco Carrau, Gemma Beltran, Albert Mas (2016) Comparison of Fermentation and Wines Produced by Inoculation of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 7, 338.

A Xufre, H Albergaria, J Inácio, I Spencer-Martins, F Gírio (2006) Application of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to the analysis of yeast population dynamics in winery and laboratory grape must fermentations. 108(3), 376-384.

Rocío Velázquez, Emiliano Zamora, María Álvarez, Luis Hernández, Manuel Ramírez (2015) Effects of new Torulaspora delbrueckii killer yeasts on the must fermentation kinetics and aroma compounds of white table wine. 6, 1222.

I Pretorius, F Benito, S (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. 16, 675-729.

David Peris, William Alexander, Kaitlin Fisher, Ryan Moriarty, Mira Basuino, Emily Ubbelohde, Russell Wrobel, Chris Hittinger (2020) Synthetic hybrids of six yeast species. 11(1), 2085.

Matthias Sipiczki (2019) Yeast two‐ and three‐species hybrids and high‐sugar fermentation. 12(6), 1101-1108.

M Lairón-Peris, L Pérez-Través, S Muñiz-Calvo, J Guillamón, J Heras, E Barrio, A Querol (2020) Differential contribution of the parental genomes to a S. cerevisiae×S. uvarum hybrid, inferred by phenomic, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses, at different industrial stress conditions. 8, 129.

Adrienn Szabó, Zsuzsa Antunovics, Edina Karanyicz, Matthias Sipiczki (2020) Diversity and Postzygotic Evolution of the Mitochondrial Genome in Hybrids of Saccharomyces Species Isolated by Double Sterility Barrier. 11, 838.

Anthony Borneman, Brian Desany, David Riches, Jason Affourtit, Angus Forgan, Isak Pretorius, Michael Egholm, Paul Chambers (2012) The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. 12(1), 88-96.

Zhijun Duan, Mirela Andronescu, Kevin Schutz, Sean Mcilwain, Yoo Kim, Choli Lee, Jay Shendure, Stanley Fields, C Blau, William Noble (2010) A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. 465(7296), 363-367.

Daniel Gibson, J Venter (2014) Construction of a yeast chromosome. 509(7499), 168-169.

Marc Lajoie, Alexis Rovner, Daniel Goodman, Hans-Rudolf Aerni, Adrian Haimovich, Gleb Kuznetsov, Jaron Mercer, Harris Wang, Peter Carr, Joshua Mosberg, Nadin Rohland, Peter Schultz, Joseph Jacobson, Jesse Rinehart, George Church, Farren Isaacs (2013) Genomically Recoded Organisms Expand Biological Functions. 342(6156), 357-360.

Guillaume Mercy, Julien Mozziconacci, Vittore Scolari, Kun Yang, Guanghou Zhao, Agnès Thierry, Yisha Luo, Leslie Mitchell, Michael Shen, Yue Shen, Roy Walker, Weimin Zhang, Yi Wu, Ze-Xiong Xie, Zhouqing Luo, Yizhi Cai, Junbiao Dai, Huanming Yang, Ying-Jin Yuan, Jef Boeke, Joel Bader, Héloïse Muller, Romain Koszul (2017) 3D organization of synthetic and scrambled chromosomes. 355(6329), 1050-4597.

I Pretorius (2020) Tasting the terroir of wine yeast innovation. 20(1), 84.

Danna Lee, Natoiya Lloyd, Isak Pretorius, Anthony Borneman (2016) Heterologous production of raspberry ketone in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae via pathway engineering and synthetic enzyme fusion. 15(1), 49.

M Lambrechts, I Pretorius (2000) Yeast and its Importance to Wine Aroma - A Review. 21(1), 97-129.

Santiago Benito, Felipe Palomero, Antonio Morata, Fernando Calderón, José Suárez‐lepe (2012) New applications for Schizosaccharomyces pombe in the alcoholic fermentation of red wines. 47(10), 2101-2108.

O Unterholzner, M Aurich, K Platter (1988) Geschmacks und Geruchsfehler bei Rotweinen verursacht durch Schizosaccharomyces pombe L. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg, Rebe und Wein. 38, 66-70.

C Raynal, F Wardrop, O Pillet, P Languet, A Dumont, A Ortiz-Julien (2011) An innovative tool for the winemaker: sequential inoculation with a non-Saccharomyces yeast and a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. 16.

S Rinaldi, A Tiano, S Serban, R Pittson, Z Lajic, H Politi, N El Murr, A Armani, A Cavazza (2006) Monitoring wine quality and fermentation kinetics with innovative technologies. 10.

B O'neill, T Van Heeswijck, R Muhlack (2011) Models for predicting wine fermentation kinetics.

R Assar, F Vargas, D Sherman (2012) Algebraic and Numeric Biology. 6479.

A Zinnai, F Venturi, C Sanmartin, G Andrich (2019) The Kinetics of Alcoholic Fermentation by Two Yeast Strains in High Sugar Concentration Media. 3(2), 2-5.

Clemente-Jimenez, J Mingorance-Cazorla, L Martínez-Rodríguez, S Las Heras-Vázquez, F Rodríguez-Vico, F (2005) Influence of sequential yeast mixtures on wine fermentation. 98(3), 301-308.

A Garcia, C Carcel, L Dulau, A Samson, E Aguera, E Agosin, Z Günata (2006) Influence of a Mixed Culture with Debaryomyces vanriji and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the Volatiles of a Muscat Wine. 67(3), 1138-1143.

Graham Fleet (2008) Wine yeasts for the future. 8(7), 979-995.

V Rojas, J Gil, F Piñaga, P Manzanares (2001) Studies on acetate ester production by non-Saccharomyces. 70, 283-289.

N Moreira, F Mendes, P Guedes De Pinho, T Hogg, I Vasconcelos (2008) Heavy sulphur compounds, higher alcohols and esters production profile of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii grown as pure and mixed cultures in grape must. 124(3), 231-238.

Fernando Viana, José Gil, Salvador Vallés, Paloma Manzanares (2009) Increasing the levels of 2-phenylethyl acetate in wine through the use of a mixed culture of Hanseniaspora osmophila and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 135(1), 68-74.

Karina Medina, Eduardo Boido, Eduardo Dellacassa, Francisco Carrau (2012) Growth of non-Saccharomyces yeasts affects nutrient availability for Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. 157(2), 245-250.

Mengqi Ye, Tianli Yue, Yahong Yuan (2014) Effects of sequential mixed cultures ofWickerhamomyces anomalusandSaccharomyces cerevisiaeon apple cider fermentation. 14(6), 873-882.

Lucía Mendoza, María De Nadra, Marta Farías (2007) Kinetics and metabolic behavior of a composite culture of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine related strains. 29(7), 1057-1063.

R Zironi, P Romano, G Suzzi, F Battistutta, G Comi (1993) Volatile metabolites produced in wine by mixed and sequential cultures of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii or Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 15(3), 235-238.

H Erten, H Tanguler (2010) Influence of Williopsis saturnus yeasts in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on wine fermentation. 50, 474-479.

Yuyun Lu, Jannice Peh, Pin-Rou Lee, Shao-Quan Liu (2017) Modulation of grape wine flavor via the sequential inoculation ofWilliopsis saturnusandSaccharomyces cerevisiae. 31(4), 245-263.

Pin-Rou Lee, Irene Siew-May Chong, Bin Yu, Philip Curran, Shao-Quan Liu (2012) Effects of sequentially inoculated Williopsis saturnus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on volatile profiles of papaya wine. 45(1), 177-183.

Tristan Porter, Benoit Divol, Mathabatha Setati (2019) Lachancea yeast species: Origin, biochemical characteristics and oenological significance. 119, 378-389.

M Sipiczki (2003) Candida zemplinina sp. nov., an osmotolerant and psychrotolerant yeast that ferments sweet botrytized wines. 53(6), 2079-2083.

Comparative Evaluation of the Dynamics of Alcohol Production of  Wine Yeast Strains Isolated in Tokaj Region

Published

2020-07-31

How to Cite

Comparative Evaluation of the Dynamics of Alcohol Production of Wine Yeast Strains Isolated in Tokaj Region. (2020). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 20(D6), 1-22. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/2744