Impact of GDP and HDI on Military Expenditures: Survey and Evidence from Dynamic Panel Data Model

Authors

  • Mahmoud Mourad

  • Adel Amin El-Mourawed

  • Firas Mourad

Military expenditures, GDP, HDI, dynamic panel data, Arellano-Bond estimator

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Human Development Index (HDI) on the Military Expenditures (ME) in 116 countries in the world. First, a rich descriptive statistical analysis is performed for the global time series associated with the GDP and ME for the 116 countries as well as for all the countries in the world. The ratio of ME to GDP has also been analyzed using descriptive statistics. An in-depth graphical analysis is developed by arranging the 116 countries in increasing order from smallest to largest HDI. We classified these 116 countries into four groups according to the four HDI levels. Second, the optimum orders of the DPD model are selected, where all variables are taken in natural logarithm and using the automatic criteria, AIC, BIC, and HQ. By changing the instruments each time, it has been possible to propose the DPD (2, 0, 2) model in first difference form. Third, dealing with the Arellano-Bond (AB) 1-step and 2-step estimators, a study of the determination of valid instruments and the two GMM steps were presented to make the subject more understandable. Finally, the (AB) estimators have been executed, and the findings reveal an immediate positive impact of GDP on military expenditures, while an indirect HDI effect was observed but delayed for two years.

Downloads

How to Cite

Impact of GDP and HDI on Military Expenditures: Survey and Evidence from Dynamic Panel Data Model. (2019). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 19(F2), 1-17. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/2472

References

(2009) Unknown Title.

T Anderson, Cheng Hsiao (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. 18(1), 47-82.

M Arellano (2018) What does the Arellano-Bond estimator do? Class Notes Manuel Arellano September 20.

Manuel Arellano, Stephen Bond (1991) Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. 58(2), 277.

Manuel Arellano, Olympia Bover (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. 68(1), 29-51.

M Arellano (2002) Sargan's Instrumental Variables Estimation and the Generalized Method of Moments. 20(4), 450-459.

Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. 87(1), 115-143.

S Bond (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. 1, 141-162.

Maurice Bun, Vasilis Sarafidis (2012) Dynamic Panel Data Models. 76-110.

F Gervásio (2013) Fuel demand in Brazil in a dynamic panel data approach. 36, 229-240.

W Greene (2008) Econometric Analysis.

Lars Hansen (1982) Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators. 50(4), 1029.

Cheng Hsiao, Qiankun Zhou (2017) Jive for Panel Dynamic Simultaneous Equations Models. 17-24.

G Imbens, J Angrist, A Krueger (1999) Jackknife Instrumental Variables Estimation. 14(1), 57-67.

Jan Kiviet, Milan Pleus, Rutger Poldermans (2017) Accuracy and Efficiency of Various GMM Inference Techniques in Dynamic Micro Panel Data Models. 5(1), 14.

K Kholodilin, B Siliverstovs, S Kooths (2008) A Dynamic Panel Data Approach to the Forecasting of the GDP of German Länder. 3(2), 195-207.

Mahmoud Mourad, Bilal Nehme (2019) Economic Determinants Affecting Military Expenditures : Panel Data Analysis. 11-41.

Elias Oikarinen, Janne Engblom (2016) Differences in housing price dynamics across cities: A comparison of different panel model specifications. 53(11), 2312-2329.

Impact of GDP and HDI on Military Expenditures: Survey and  Evidence from Dynamic Panel Data Model

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

Impact of GDP and HDI on Military Expenditures: Survey and Evidence from Dynamic Panel Data Model. (2019). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 19(F2), 1-17. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/2472