The Digital Space Structure,Superconductor, and Superstar

Authors

  • Ding-Yu Chung

space structure, quantum mechanics, force fields, superconductor, superstar, black hole, gravastar, GRB, collapsar, singularity

Abstract

In the digital space structure, space is digitalized by 1 and 0 for attachment space and detachment space, respectively. A special force field (the short-range extreme force field) can be derived from the digital space structure to generate superconductor at extremely low temperature and superstar at extremely high density. Singularity-free superstar is a model for the collapse of large stars and for GRBs, and as an alternative to black hole. Attachment space allows object to attach to account for rest mass and reversible movement, while detachment space allows no object to attach to account for irreversible kinetic energy. The combination of attachment space and detachment space brings about the three structures: binary partition space, miscible space, orbinary lattice space. Binary partition space (1) n (0) n consists of separated continuous phases of attachment space and detachment space to account for quantum mechanics and extreme force field. In miscible space (1+0) n , attachment space is miscible to detachment space without separation to account for special relativity.

Downloads

How to Cite

The Digital Space Structure,Superconductor, and Superstar. (2014). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 14(A3), 1-8. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/1091

References

Ding-Yu Chung, Volodymyr Krasnoholovets (2013) The Space Structure, Force Fields, and Dark Matter. 04(04), 27-31.

D Chung, V Krasnoholovets (2007) The Cosmic Organism Theory. 8, 165-182.

V Krasnoholovets, D Chung (2006) The Space Structure, Force Fields and Quantum Mechanics. 191-197.

D Chung, R Hefferlin (2013) The Higgs Boson in the Periodic System of Elementary Particles. 4, 21-26.

B Diaz, P Rowlands (2003) A Computational path to the Nilpotent Dirac Equation. 203-218.

J Bell (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. 1(3), 195-200.

R Penrose (2000) Wavefunction Collapse as a Real Gravitational Effect. 266-282.

J Bardeen, L Cooper, J Schrieffer (1957) Theory of Superconductivity. 108(5), 1175-1205.

Stan Woosley, Thomas Janka (2005) The physics of core-collapse supernovae. 1(3), 147-154.

A Macfadyen, S Woosley (1999) Collapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in "Failed Supernovae". 524(1), 262-289.

Y Fanand, T Piran (2006) Gamma-ray burst efficiency and possible physical processes shaping the early afterglow. 369, 197-206.

J Katz (2002) The Biggest Bangs. 37.

G Fraley (1968) Supernovae Explosions Induced by Pair-Production Instability. 2(1), 96-114.

Amit Kashi, Noam Soker (2008) Possible implications of mass accretion in Eta Carinae. 14(1), 11-24.

P Mazur, E Mottola (2004) Gravitational Vacuum Condensate Stars. 111, 9545-9550.

E Nakar (2007) Short-hard gamma-ray bursts. 442(1-6), 166-236.

Chryssa Kouveliotou, Charles Meegan, Gerald Fishman, Narayana Bhat, Michael Briggs, Thomas Koshut, William Paciesas, Geoffrey Pendleton (1993) Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts. 413, L101.

The Digital Space Structure,Superconductor, and Superstar

Published

2014-07-20

How to Cite

The Digital Space Structure,Superconductor, and Superstar. (2014). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 14(A3), 1-8. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/1091