Balancing Coexistence: Ecological Dynamics and Optimal Tax Policies in a Dual Phytoplankton-Zooplankton System Influenced by Toxin Avoidance and Harvesting

Authors

  • Yuqin

  • Wensheng Yang

toxic phytoplankton; human harvest; time delay; optimal tax policy; hopf bifurcation

Abstract

In recent years, the impact of toxic phytoplankton on ecological balance has attracted more and more ecologists to study. In this paper, we develop and analyze a model with three interacting species, poisonous and nontoxic phytoplankton, and zooplankton, including zooplankton avoiding toxic phytoplankton in the presence of non-toxic phytoplankton, and the impact of human harvest on the coexistence of these three species. We first introduce the poisonous avoidance coefficient and the human harvest of nontoxic phytoplankton and zooplankton to investigate its impact on species coexistence. We not only find that has a particular effect on the coexistence of these three species. But also that human harvest is an essential factor determining the coexistence of these three species. Secondly, pregnancy delay ( ) and toxin onset delay ( ) are introduced to explore the influence of time delay on the behavior of dynamic systems. When the delay value exceeds its critical value, the system will lose stability and go through Hopf bifurcation. After that, we use the principle of Pontryagin's maximum to study the optimal tax policy without delay. We obtained the optimal path of the optimal tax policy. Finally, we carry out numerical simulations to verify the theoretical results.

Downloads

How to Cite

Balancing Coexistence: Ecological Dynamics and Optimal Tax Policies in a Dual Phytoplankton-Zooplankton System Influenced by Toxin Avoidance and Harvesting. (2024). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 23(F8), 1-31. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/102796

References

Cody Zilverberg, Jay Angerer, Jimmy Williams, Loretta Metz, Keith Harmoney (2018) Sensitivity of diet choices and environmental outcomes to a selective grazing algorithm. 390, 10-22.

Aditee Mitra, Kevin Flynn (2006) Accounting for variation in prey selectivity by zooplankton. 199(1), 82-92.

S Linhart, J Roberts, S Shumake, R Johnson (1976) Avoidance of prey by captive coyotes punished with electric shock. 302-330.

S Ghorai, B Chakraborty, N Bairagi (2021) Preferential selection of zooplankton and emergence of spatiotemporal patterns in plankton population. 153, 111471.

X Liu, C Tang, C Wong (2014) Microzooplankton grazing and selective feeding during bloom periods in the Tolo Harbour area as revealed by HPLC pigment analysis. 90, 83-94.

Yanlin Zheng, Xiang Gong, Huiwang Gao (2022) Selective grazing of zooplankton on phytoplankton defines rapid algal succession and blooms in oceans. 468, 109947.

Karen Porter (1973) Selective Grazing and Differential Digestion of Algae by Zooplankton. 244(5412), 179-180.

B Frost (1972) EFFECTS OF SIZE AND CONCENTRATION OF FOOD PARTICLES ON THE FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF THE MARINE PLANKTONIC COPEPOD CALANUS PACIFICUS 1. 17(6), 805-815.

Qiuyue Zhao, Shutang Liu, Dadong Tian (2018) Dynamic behavior analysis of phytoplankton-zooplankton system with cell size and time delay. 113, 160-168.

C Zilverberg, J Angerer, J Williams, L Metz, K Harmoney (2018) Sensitivity of diet choices and environmental outcomes to a selective grazing algorithm. 390, 10-22.

S Uye, K Takamatsu (1990) Feeding interactions between planktonic copepods and red-tide flagellates from Japanese coastal waters. 59, 97-107.

J Sole, E Garcia-Ladona, M Estrada (2006) The role of selective predation in harmful algal blooms. 62, 46-54.

Kulbhushan Agnihotri, Harpreet Kaur (2021) Optimal control of harvesting effort in a phytoplankton-zooplankton model with infected zooplankton under the influence of toxicity. 190, 946-964.

J Chattopadhyay (1996) Effect of toxic substances on a two-species competitive system. 84(13), 287-289.

Subhendu Chakraborty, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Ulrike Feudel, J Chattopadhyay (2012) The role of avoidance by zooplankton for survival and dominance of toxic phytoplankton. 11, 144-153.

Swati Khare, O Misra, Joydip Dhar (2010) Role of toxin producing phytoplankton on a plankton ecosystem. 4(3), 496-502.

N Turriff, J Runge, A Cembella (1995) Toxin accumulation and feeding behaviour of the planktonic copepod Calanus finmarchicus exposed to the red-tide dinoflagellate Alexandrium excavatum. 123(1), 55-64.

S Jang, J Baglama, J Rick (2006) Nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton models with a toxin. 43(12), 105-118.

B Dubey, J Hussain (2000) A model for the allelopathic effect on two competing species. 129(23), 195-207.

G Samanta (2011) A Stochastic Two Species Competition Model: Nonequilibrium Fluctuation and Stability. 2011, 1-7.

Shovonlal Roy, Joydev Chattopadhyay (2007) TOXIN-ALLELOPATHY AMONG PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES PREVENTS COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION. 15(01), 73-93.

Y Pei, Y Lv, C Li (2012) Evolutionary consequences of harvesting for a two-zooplankton one-phytoplankton system. 36(4), 1752-1765.

Kunal Chakraborty, Sanjoy Das, T Kar (2011) Optimal control of effort of a stage structured prey-predator fishery model with harvesting. 12(6), 3452-3467.

C Clark (1985) Bioeconomic Modelling and Fisheries Management.

P Panja, S Mondal, D Jana (2017) Effects of toxicants on Phytoplankton-Zooplankton-Fish dynamics and harvesting. 104, 389-399.

Feifan Zhang, Jiamin Sun, Wang Tian (2022) Spatiotemporal pattern selection in a nontoxic-phytoplankton - toxic-phytoplankton - zooplankton model with toxin avoidance effects. 423, 127007.

Dongmei Xiao, Leslie Jennings (2005) Bifurcations of a Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey System with Constant Rate Harvesting. 65(3), 737-753.

Yunfei Lv, Yongzhen Pei, Shujing Gao, Changguo Li (2010) Harvesting of a phytoplankton-zooplankton model. 11(5), 3608-3619.

A Sharma, A Sharma, K Agnihotri (2016) Bifurcation behaviors analysis of a plankton model with multiple delays. 9(06), 1650086.

Kulbhushan Agnihotri, Harpreet Kaur (2019) The dynamics of viral infection in toxin producing phytoplankton and zooplankton system with time delay. 118, 122-133.

Ashok Mondal, A Pal, G Samanta (2020) Rich dynamics of non-toxic phytoplankton, toxic phytoplankton and zooplankton system with multiple gestation delays. 8(1), 112-131.

P Panday, S Samanta, N (2020) Delay induced multiple stability switch and chaos in a predatorprey model with fear effect. 172, 134-158.

Tapan Kar (2005) Conservation of a fishery through optimal taxation: a dynamic reaction model. 10(2), 121-131.

Sudipto Sarkar (2009) Optimal fishery harvesting rules under uncertainty. 31(4), 272-286.

J Sotomayor (1973) Generic bifurcations of dynamical systems.

Balancing Coexistence: Ecological Dynamics and  Optimal Tax Policies in a Dual  Phytoplankton-Zooplankton System Influenced by  Toxin Avoidance and Harvesting

Published

2024-01-20

How to Cite

Balancing Coexistence: Ecological Dynamics and Optimal Tax Policies in a Dual Phytoplankton-Zooplankton System Influenced by Toxin Avoidance and Harvesting. (2024). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 23(F8), 1-31. https://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/102796