Contract Farming in Sugarcane and Reactions of the Farmers a A Study in Odisha
contract farming, sugarcane cultivation, respondents, support
Abstract
Contract farming requires a long term commitment from both the contracted growers and sponsoring firms. Exploitative arrangements can jeopardize agribusiness investments. The study revealed that the contracted sugarcane growers reacted significantly towards immediate payment, arranging credit for infrastructure, implements and machineries on custom hiring, increasing risk bearing abilities, conflict resolution, quality production, transparency in measurement, contingent measures in catastrophes, exposure visit etc. The sponsoring firms have to analyze all these reactions of the respondents and extend all possible supports for sustainability of the contract farming in sugarcane cultivation.
Downloads
How to Cite
References
M Adewumi, A Afolayan, P Masika (2010) Contract farming approach to essential oil production in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. 10(1), 73-79.
S Gupta (2002) Contract farming. 18(1), 64-67.
H Kumar, R Singh (2005) Success and failure of contract farming in Himachal Pradesh; A case study of cauliflower seed production. 19(2), 170-174.
Masakune, S Henson (2005) why do small scale producers choose to produce under contract. 33(10), 1721-1733.
Arun Pandit, Barsati Lal, Rajesh Rana (2009) An Assessment of Potato Contract Farming in West Bengal State, India. 58(1), 1-14.
Published
2015-06-06
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.